I am a software engineer by trade, available for freelance and consulting. These are my writings; mostly non-professional. You can also find me on Bluesky and Github.
-
Music is Dead; Long Live Music
November 28, 2022
It’s all folk music now.
The importance of musical movements and the innovation of new genres has been declining for some time now. I know that people have been saying this forever. I also realize that, at 26, I’m the prime age to join the “music is dead” camp; the bands I loved as a teenager are old now. But, in my mind at least, it’s not that I’m disappointed by the new styles of music coming out; I’m not even claiming that new music is particularly bad. I’m really asking: where is the new music? Not that there aren’t a billion songs being made every second, but where are the new styles? Where are the sounds that will define the early 2020s in popular culture? Listen to the first 30 seconds of this song:
Someone who is familiar with popular music of the last 50 years or so will probably be able to place this song in a timeline of musical movements with a decent amount of accuracy – i.e. they would be able to guess that the song was released in the 1980s. Will we be able to identify 2020s music the same way?
Keep reading -
Montreal is What North America Could Be
September 30, 2022
Montreal, Quebec is the second largest city in Canada after Toronto, and only about 5 hours away by car. Until last week, I had never been there. I am much more familiar with Toronto, having grown up nearby in Hamilton. I now live in Waterloo, Ontario, also close to Toronto – about 100km to the West. Toronto, Hamilton and Waterloo actually share a lot of similarities in their built forms (at different scales) that are recognizable across a lot of North America. They are dominated by detached homes, often set back from the road by lawns. Multi-family housing is generally confined to the downtown, and mainly comes in the form of high-rise towers. Toronto is a large city, but I am always amazed at how suburban the metropolis is. Sure, the downtown core is stocked with very, very tall skyscrapers. But venture just a little bit outwards and you’re more likely to find single-family detached homes than anything else. Take a look at this Google streetview photo:
Keep reading -
Book Review: Seeing Like a State
September 16, 2022
In which humans try to control complex systems at their peril.
Seeing like a State by James C. Scott is an exploration of the ways that governments have shaped the world to their ends over the past few hundred years. The enlightenment created a new faith in science, and the use of the scientific method to understand and dramatically reshape society and culture. Scott ambitiously groups together many separate social phenomena, as disparate as the creation of standardized units of measurement, the adoption of permanent surnames, the central planning of economies, scientific agriculture, and modern city planning, into a coherent process of centralization and standardization undertaken by states, calling the philosophy underlying all of these developments high modernism. High modernism is essentially the belief that “traditional” forms of knowledge and ways of doing things are backwards and outdated, and that the application of central planning by trained experts using science ought to replace these traditional ways. In the case of standardizing measurements, this looks like replacing local, colloquial measurements, which are based on the industries that use them and vary greatly from region to region, with standards like metres, kilograms, etc. In the case of city planning, this means replacing ancient, dense, unplanned cities with centrally planned grid cities zoned to create order and regularity. The book is generally a critique of high modernism, and especially the application of this philosophy in authoritarian settings like communist states and European colonies.
Keep reading -
The Bear is a Breath of Fresh Air for TV
August 30, 2022
Note: this post contains spoilers for FXs “The Bear” season 1.
It was after watching two seasons of Succession that I finally realized it is a show where each and every character is evil and incapable of change. At first I rooted for Shiv. She seemed reasonable in those first couple of episodes! Then Gerri, Kendall, then even Roman for a bit. The show settled into a kind of rotation where each of the siblings has their turn to display a glimmer of likeability. The audience grasps onto these moments like a life raft; anything to avoid drowning in the cynicism! But then, gotcha! It was a ruse; the life raft is actually a lure, and you’re caught and pulled further down into the dark world of the Roys. This gridlock became frustrating after a while. I continued to watch Succession loyally of course, unable to abandon such an otherwise well-written show; but I wisened up and accepted that each of these characters is rotten to their scheming, power hungry cores; they will never see the light.
Keep reading -
On Land Ownership
August 19, 2022
Negara mawi tata, desa mawi cara (The capital has its order, the village its customs).
—Javanese proverb
I have recently been reading Seeing Like a State by James C. Scott, a book about ways in which governments create simplified schemas in order to make complex systems “legible”; i.e. understandable, measurable, manipulatable. It’s also about how these schemas, applied by the power of the state, actually end up shaping what they measure, usually along the lines of creating an optimization process for the metric or narrow set of metrics being measured, often at the expense of the system as a whole. For example, if you were a state managing a forest for lumber, you might track the number of trees of a certain variety and their heights and diameters as a way to know how much lumber you might expect to be able to extract from the forest per year, and ignore such things as the density and diversity of undergrowth, animals that live in the forest, etc. However, this might lead you to begin planting rows of trees of all the same species to replace the old growth forests you cut down, because according to the way you “see” the forest this is optimal for maximizing lumber. Your schema for seeing the forest ignores the necessity of its diversity, and this results in some unforeseen side-affect like disease destroying your whole crop of planted trees, or declining soil fertility which results in poor yields several generations down the line.
Keep reading